Tag Archives: U.S. Supreme Court

The ballot box and the power to save lives

MARJORIE DANNENFELSER: Legates must engage politically during this fall’s elections . . .

Marjorie Dannenfelser

Marjorie Dannenfelser

Pro-lifers and religious liberty lovers cheered the U.S. Supreme Court’s June 30 Hobby Lobby ruling, which confirmed that religious people don’t have to choose between their faith and their business.

The hostile response to this modest win, however, is a clear indication that the battle to keep our voices is far from over. Our responsibility as Catholics to engage in the public square has reached a tipping point. Last year Pope Francis spoke of our obligation to engage politically: “I have to do my best by participating in politics according to my ability. We all have something to give!”

Not one of us can shirk this responsibility to participate — to reach out to the marginalized, the weak and the vulnerable. What use is it to fight for our own voices when we don’t use them to fight for those who have none?

The unborn child has no voice. As the abortionist’s instrument draws near, she emits a silent scream, recoiling from the pain. In fact, research shows that by at least five months gestation (20 weeks), the developing child feels pain, making abortion a particularly excruciating death. A recent study by the Charlotte Lozier Institute found that the U.S. is one of only seven countries — including China and North Korea — to allow abortion beyond this point.

Groaning under the burden of this brutal national distinction, 13 states have already passed laws to address this butchery. Last year, Washington took notice. At the encouragement of Susan B. Anthony List, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a compassionate, common-sense limit.

Despite the efforts of our coalition in the U.S. Senate, led by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), pro-abortion Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has repeatedly blocked advancement of the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act in the second chamber. That’s why SBA List and our partner, Women Speak Out PAC, has launched a multi-state campaign targeting vulnerable senators in North Carolina, Arkansas, and Louisiana — all who oppose the five-month limit.

For the last few weeks and through Election Day, our pro-life volunteers will knock on thousands of doors to speak face-to-face with pro-life and swing voters, educating them about this historic legislation and encouraging them to elect a senator who will support it. Gains made at the ballot box will translate directly to Congress, where Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has already pledged to bring the Pain- Capable bill to a vote if his party takes the majority.

All of this gets us one step closer to our goal of saving the 18,000 children whose lives are ended by late abortion every year — 18,000 unique individuals who were sent to this world with a purpose. The consequences of failing to act are dire. Real lives hang in the balance. Lives like Charlotte Ryun — an extraordinary little girl who is the feature of our Women Speak Out media campaign. Charlotte’s parents, Ned and Rebecca explain how their daughter, born premature at 24 weeks, fought desperately to survive. Charlotte and other miracle babies like her are a testament to the humanity of all unborn children currently unprotected by law.

It can be easy to “check out” when it comes to politics. The outcomes seem inaccessible, the leaders disinterested. Sometimes this is true and sometimes it’s not, but our obligation remains the same: We must allow Christ’s love to transform our environment. When it is toxic and death-dealing, there is all the more reason to take what we’ve been given as Catholics — passion for bettering this world by protecting and welcoming the vulnerable — and share it. In the words of St. Catherine of Sienna: If we are what we should be, we will go out and set the world on fire!

Of all people, candidates and elected officials — especially pro- life ones — have an ability to grasp this edict deeply. It’s easy to underestimate the threats to their positive leadership. To fight for life is to make sacrifices. Whether it’s in Washington or a state house, true heroes often go without much family time, without the comforts of home and all that entails. Because there is much to accomplish (our Founding Founders spelled it out very clearly), there is much to lose. When we lose our moral and religious core, our nation suffers.

Thomas Jefferson and others warned what would happen to our form of governance if morality and religion lost hold on the hearts and minds of citizens and leaders. The experiment in democracy would fail. Children who were sent to solve our most intractable problems will continue to die before they get a chance if we put off for another day exercising our civic duty to fight for their lives. We have the power to elect leaders who will pass laws to save their lives.  Let’s use it.

MARJORIE DANNENFELSER is the president of the Susan B. Anthony List and a member of Legatus’ Northern Virginia Chapter.

Is Catholic health care a thing of the past?

Matthew Rarey: consolidation, regulation, and persecution pose a three-fold challenge . . . 

Health care providers are taking a beating from ObamaCare, and Catholic hospitals and physicians fighting to keep the faith are no exception. Many suspect that the end game is not only a singlepayer system, but a shutdown of faith-based delivery.

“Catholics should be worried,” warns John M. Haas, president of the National Catholic Bioethics Center. “It’s not so much a Catholic identity issue within Catholic health care, but fierce and relentless threats from government and a profound shift in cultural attitudes regarding issues such as contraception.”

Such threats have already forced the Church out of other social ministries — including adoption services — thanks to laws and mores condoning same-sex “marriage.”

Regulatory culture

A statue of the Blessed Mother stands in front of Loretto Hospital in New Ulm, Minn.

A statue of the Blessed Mother stands in front of Loretto Hospital in New Ulm, Minn.

John F. Brehany is executive director and ethicist of the Catholic Medical Association, an association of individuals across the country dedicated to learning, implementing, and sharing their faith in the health care industry. Most of its 2,000 members are physicians.

He cites two factors militating against a robust Catholic identity in health care.

“First, the federal government is actively hostile to the Catholic faith and at best indifferent to the protection of conscience rights in organized medicine,” Brehany says. Of particular concern is the Health and Human Services (HHS) mandate. This employer requirement to provide insurance plans covering contraceptives, abortifacients, and sterilization procedures is “proving a real challenge to the Catholic institutional presence in health care.”

The U.S. Supreme Court heard cases seeking the mandate’s repeal in late March and is expected to give its ruling at the end of June.

Second, says Brehany, is the financial pressure being exerted upon health care providers to stay in business. To “cut more costs out of the delivery structure, many are consolidating,” he notes. Encouraging this trend is the need to comply with ever more burdensome federal regulations — a costly procedure that’s putting many physicians out of private practice.

“Government has so ramped up regulations and penalties for compliance with federal law that private physicians are being driven out of business and joining hospitals,” Brehany explains. “They can’t afford the software systems and lawyers necessary to letting them know whether they’re in continual compliance,” thus avoiding crippling penalties. When Catholic hospitals consolidate with non-Catholic hospitals for similar reasons, these consolidations can pose “a challenge to maintaining a robust Catholic identity.”

Consolidation, not compromise

John Haas

John Haas

In 2012, Catholic Healthcare West relinquished its formal Catholic identity in order to expand its network to include non-Catholic hospitals, thus increasing its marketing power and profitability. Now called Dignity Health, it may be a harbinger of further consolidations by which Catholic health care providers drop their Catholic identity for the sake of the bottom line.Despite that change in name and formal identity, “there’s more than meets the eye with the Catholic Healthcare West issue,” Haas notes. Dignity Health’s transformation was made in consultation with the Church and approved by former San Francisco Archbishop George Niederauer. It has promised to run its Catholic hospitals in accord with the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) document Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services.

“But it now means that the overarching system of Dignity can bring non-Catholic hospitals into the system and have them continue doing things Catholic hospitals can’t,” says Haas, citing sterilization procedures. “Dignity has said none of its hospitals can perform abortions, however. There’s still a strong Catholic moral influence.”

Haas says that consolidation is the trend of the future.

“You can find almost no freestanding hospitals anymore — they’re all entering into collaborative arrangements to survive,” he told Legatus magazine shortly after returning from a meeting in Rome, where he is a member of the Pontifical Academy for Life. “When a non-Catholic hospital or system puts pressure on a Catholic partner to do things not in accord with moral law, that’s where the threats come in.”

The National Catholic Bioethics Center, led by Haas, gives ethical guidance to Catholic health care providers considering collaborative arrangements with non-Catholic entities, helping them stay true to their Catholic identity. A major concern is maintaining the principle of non-material cooperation with evil.

The NCBC worked with one Catholic health care system for over a year to maintain its integrity through the consolidation process, Haas says. The $620 million deal did not happen until the NCBC affirmed that no ethical or religious directives would be broken.

“What came into play were tubal ligations, contraception, and sterilization, which are such a miniscule part of the overall delivery of health care but in our day and age, such a neuralgic issue,” says Haas.

Peter Breen

Peter Breen

For now, vigilant bishops are key to ensuring the Catholic identity of Catholic health care, Haas says. However, a game changer may be in the works: The Obama administration’s repeal of conscience provisions, which had allowed health care providers to receive federal funds despite refusing to perform procedures the Church deems unethical, could threaten the very existence of Catholic health care.

“You often hear people saying with great bravado that a Catholic hospital would close down before it did abortions [to receive the government funding so vital to their operation],” he notes. “If it came to that and a Catholic hospital refused to do abortions, the state could take it over and say this institution exists by our leave as a non-profit. It’s happened before in Church history, but not yet here in America.”

Catholic health care in the catacombs?

Peter Breen, executive director and legal counsel of the Thomas More Society, says the movement in politics to devalue faith-based ministries has turned into active hostility.

Concerning mergers between Catholic and secular health care institutions, Breen says “there’s a real fight over whose ethics will win out.” In a case not yet made public, the Thomas More Society is defending a Catholic doctor that a secular hospital involved in a partnership with a Catholic hospital refused to hire because of his opposition to administering abortifacient birth control.

Even more ominous, Breen cites a recent suit that the American Civil Liberties Union filed against the USCCB because its Ethical and Religious Directives bars abortion.

“I don’t mean to be apocalyptic,” says Breen, “but if Catholic bishops are unable to set ethical guidelines for institutions calling themselves Catholic, we’re going to have a hard time maintaining an official relation between the Church and not-for-profit Catholic health facilities. If the ACLU is successful, we’ll be put in a tough spot as a Church.”

Joseph Piccione, senior vice president for mission and ethics at Peoria, Ill.-based OSF HealthCare System, says he’s hopeful yet realistic about the continuance of that fundamental part of Catholic discipleship and identity: caring for the sick.

“When we see how Catholic ministries have struggled to remain active even in oppressive communist regimes, we know that we have a learned flexibility from their example,” says Piccione, who holds a licentiate in theology as well as a civil law degree. “We need to be quick on our feet and find ways to continue to serve. Why? Because that’s what the Lord wants of us.”

MATTHEW A. RAREY is Legatus magazine’s editorial assistant.

Learn more: